Rule 8 Look for assertions that are plainly false.
Each hyperlink here takes you to the same exhibit of all the replies.
Take note the similitude of format in replies. THREE different people use the same phrase to
abrogate their responsibility for the consequences, of their decisions, making all the faults mine. Try and search all my replies for the keywords dissatisfied or unhappy, and discover I NEVER used the words at all, except in the final reply to Mr. Redmond where I dispute his usage of the term. Each ombudsman uses the same phrase, lacking originality, relying on a common template approach as pretexts for steps in reasoning that are ‘non-sequiturs’, since the grounds, are simply false and never existed. A farce, mockery, deplorable casuistry and without question totally fallacious reasoning!
Because you have said you are dissatisfied........Moriarty..............February
Because you have said you are unhappy ..........O. Malley.............March
Because you appear to be dissatisfied...............Redmond.............April
A serious and almost criminally culpable mixture of ‘suppresio veri’ and ‘suggesto falsi’ combines with a combination of credent bulk, or assumption of authority, fallacious logic, balking action of rewriting what you have written without using direct quotations, thus making up a synthetic false assertion of what you wrote, and combining it with referral upwards in a chain of authority making a lethal cocktail of criminal institutionalised conduct that in my view should justify the institution be radically reformed, the deponents dismissed or the body dismantled as a total hypocrisy misprision towards its stated functionality.
I will show you a comparison between the recent LGO and PCA attempts to obfuscate where clarity of terms reigned like clear water, churning out a muddied detritus of mental aberrations. Don;t dismiss the case material as irrelevant simply on the grounds of the titles of the institutions, the malfeasances are surrounding you in very walk of life where a large in dependant or otherwise institution is at work.
There are two primary exhibits, comprising a comparison of similar techniques used by the LGO recently and the PCA in 2000. I have no recent experience with the newly named IPCC but take the view that a renaming of an institution, with a description of its function in full sales talk as being independent (charged for me with scepticism) when financed from the central purse, is unlikely not to have some influential effect tracing the lines from purse to employee, as in every situation of such relationship. It does not particularly look comforting to make a satisfactory complaint. I should say however that personally I have found Police conduct toward myself to be non existent since 2000, as it should be for any innocent citizen.
The Local Ombudsman’s view,
On the credibility of complaints against them.
Substitute justice for HE.
He (justice) should have liv'd, Save that his riotous youth, with dangerous sense, Might in the times to come have ta'en revenge, By so receiving a dishonour'd life With ransom of such shame. Would yet he (justice) had liv'd! Alack, when once our grace we have forgot, Nothing goes right; we would, and we would not.
YES!..........MEASURE FOR MEASURE
Truth, Integrity, Logic, Reason, Sense, & Justice.
